Member Articles

Port State Control in Ukraine: Obstacles and Changes

June 12, 2017

By: Evgeniy Sukachev
Email: e.sukachev@blacksealawcompany.com
Senior Partner in Black Sea Law Company
& Irina Dolya 
Associate in Black Sea Law Company

Port State Control in Ukraine: Obstacles and Changes

Every shipper coming to Ukrainian ports faces the bureaucratic and unfair system of the Ukrainian Port State Control.

Maritime Ecological Inspections such as Ecological Inspection of North-West Black Sea region of Ukraine and Ecological Inspection of Azov Sea of Ukraine provide port state control on the ecological security and act on the basis of The Maritime Ecological Inspections Statute.

The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (hereinafter – ‘the Government’) initiated the renewal of ecological control concept in Ukraine. The Method of calculation of damages caused by oil pollution used in Ukraine was recognized inefficient and outdated.

The Government’s Directive enacted on March 10, 2017, that comes in force on May 21, 2017, and through it several significant Instructions shall be invalid: Instruction on the transport nuclear control at the border crossing, Instructions on the waters monitoring provision, unified forms of Examination acts for ecological control provision, approved by the Ministry of Ecology and Resources on the October 02, 2012; and one of the main ones – Method of calculation of damages caused by oil pollution, approved by the Government on April, 26, 2003, shall be invalid from May 21, 2017.

The new Concept of the ecological control provision in ports of Ukraine shall correspond to modern merchant shipping business. The Government directed to remove insufficient procedures that interfere with developing business in Ukraine. At present, the new Concept of ecological control provision in ports of Ukraine is being produced. New projects or concepts of the state control on the ecological security provision are not assigned in public.

The State Service of Ukraine for Transport Safety (hereinafter – SSUTS) provides state control on the land, maritime and water transport. SSUTS acts on the basis of The State Service of Ukraine for Transport Safety Statute approved by the Government on February 11, 2015. SSUTS provides Port State Control on the basis of The Rules on ship control for the Safety of navigation provision approved by the Ministry of Transport of Ukraine on July 17, 2003.

Shipping companies, agents and shipping managers from time to time face illegal procedures and corruption schemes in ports all over the world. Shippers coming to the ports of Ukraine must be aware of illegal demands assigned by the port state institutions.

On December 05, 2016 the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine approved The Instruction on the shipboard arrangements used for discharge of polluting substances sealing (hereinafter – the Instruction). The Instruction gives SSUTS rights to inspect seals on any vessel coming to Ukrainian port. SSUTS may detain any vessel on the ground of an insufficient sealing and occurrence of any other deficiencies.

The cases of illegal vessel detainment are not rare in the ports of Ukraine, even the amount of such illegal inspections has recently increased when some ex-“ecological” workers came to the SSUTS, with the purpose to take care of any “trouble” at the vessel through “good” company.

The illegal structure is very simple: if the agent does not want to have problems with his vessels, the agent should have the Contract with exact Company, that provides services in Ukrainian Sea and River ports.

Here is an example of such a Company: “POSEIDON ENGENEERING” LLC (hereinafter – the Company) is a private company that offers sealing services in The Odesa Sea Port, The Illichivsk Sea Port and others in Odessa, Nikolayev and Kherson regions. The ship’s Crew usually provides sealing by themselves according to MARPOL. Ukrainian Law does not stipulate an obligation to provide sealing by the specific institution or company. However, the founders of the Company are suspected of having family relations with SSUTS’s officials.

Mainly, agents and shipping companies prefer to pay for the Company’s “sealing service”. Therefore, ships that “received” the Company’s service successfully pass through the Port State Control in Ukraine.

Example:

On the April 25, 2017, m/v “GRAND BRIDGE” (IMO 9131046, flag – Belize) (hereinafter – the Ship) was detained at the Illichivsk Sea Port.

According to the Sample Form Notification of Detention issued by the SSUTS, the Ship was detained on the ground of oil leakage, cooling system water leakage and an unsatisfactory state of the engine room.

The Ship’s Crew adjudges detention illegal and groundless. According to the Ship’s Master, SSUTS’s inspection lasted for 10 minutes. The Ship’s Crew shared the video via Internet to show that the shipboard arrangements of the Ship are undamaged. The Ship’s Master insists that the inspection provided was insufficient and detention illegal. The Ship was detained shortly before the weekend and an official holiday in Ukraine – May Day.

The Ship is detained for 9 days, which resulted in severe material damage for the Owner.

Of course, such a situation could not be out of Ship-owners’, Managers’ and Agents’ attention. Before the Ship’s arrival to Ukrainian port, the Master and the Agent must be aware of all demands of port institutions. The Master should have a contact of maritime law specialist to get an immediate consultation in case an incorrect and illegal demand occurs. The Agent should be ready at any time to provide lawyers with all necessary documentation related to the Ship.

Our specialists work to decrease the amount of illegal detentions in Ukraine and improve legal acts and legal culture in Ukraine according to the demands of modern merchant shipping, and so do members of the Ukrainian Maritime Bar Association (hereinafter – UMBA), a public organization that was established with the main purpose being aimed at the development of international maritime law and national Ukrainian legislation in the respective field.

Since 2012, UMBA has been a member of the Committee Maritime International that is an organization that was formally established in 1897 and is currently one of the most authoritative international organizations, which addresses issues of the unification of maritime law. UMBA is aimed to harmonize maritime law practice in Ukraine with international standards and support the merchant shipping business development.

The Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine is the main authority that handles transport relations in Ukraine. Common Council by the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine was established on November 3, 2010, according to the Government’s Directive “On the community’s participation in government policy formation and realization provision”.

As members of Common Council by the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine, our Lawyers at Black Sea Law Company act as consultants and observers in the process of Directives and Acts in Transport sphere preparation. The work in the Common Council by the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine gives us opportunities to lead a dialogue with authorities and defend commercial interests of our clients on the national level. We do think that it is necessary to stay up to date with the current changes of Port State control in Ukraine to provide safe and successful business to our clients.


Legal Notice & Terms of Use

The information on this site and/or the material published on this site is for general information only and does not claim to be comprehensive or provide legal or other advice. Articles and other publications on this site are current as of their date of publication and do not necessarily reflect the present law or regulations. SHIPARRESTEDCOM SL accepts no responsibility for loss which may arise from accessing or reliance on information contained in this site.

FROM OUR NETWORK

Explore Related Content

Stay informed with the latest news, events, legal insights, and industry updates from across our global network.

Member Articles
MEMBER ARTICLES
Ship Mortgage in Panama
Ship Mortgage in Panama
March 30, 2026
Member Articles
MEMBER ARTICLES
Ship Arrest in Türkiye: Bunker Claims, Evidential Pitfalls, and Practical Lessons from Recent Turkish Court Practice
Ship Arrest in Türkiye: Bunker Claims, Evidential Pitfalls, and Practical Lessons from Recent Turkish Court Practice
March 23, 2026
Member Articles
MEMBER ARTICLES
Strategic Enforcement, Compliance & Maritime Claims in the Bahamas in 2026
Strategic Enforcement, Compliance & Maritime Claims in the Bahamas in 2026
March 6, 2026
Member Articles
MEMBER ARTICLES
Ship Arrest in Türkiye – Sister Ship
Ship Arrest in Türkiye – Sister Ship
July 2, 2025
Member Articles
MEMBER ARTICLES
Next of Kin: Relative, Friend or Legal Heir?
Next of Kin: Relative, Friend or Legal Heir?
August 7, 2024
Member Articles
MEMBER ARTICLES
LOUs Containing a Sanctions Clause
LOUs Containing a Sanctions Clause
January 11, 2024
Member Articles
MEMBER ARTICLES
Groundings in the Suez Canal – Law and Liability
Groundings in the Suez Canal – Law and Liability
June 20, 2023
Member Articles
MEMBER ARTICLES
Legal Procedures for Implementing Foreign International Arbitration Awards in Egypt
Legal Procedures for Implementing Foreign International Arbitration Awards in Egypt
May 19, 2023
Member Articles
MEMBER ARTICLES
Frequently Asked Questions on Ship Arrest in Panama
Frequently Asked Questions on Ship Arrest in Panama
March 16, 2023
Member Articles
MEMBER ARTICLES
Judgment Summary of the Tarik III
Judgment Summary of the Tarik III
November 11, 2022